Search This Blog

Friday, September 23, 2011

The CAIN Doctrine


Republicans last night worked hard to score points with Jewish voters and evangelical Christians by vowing their unconditional support for Israel in the face of increasing threats to its security from Iran and the so-called Arab Spring uprisings.  Candidate Herman Cain won rapturous applause when he said, plain-spoken as ever, “If you mess with Israel, you’re messing with the USA.”

Though none of his opponents questioned the “Cain Doctrine” last night, much less debated the finer points of whether US troops would enter a war between Israel and any of its enemies, it was a moment of rare clarity to be seized on.

The reason US policy in the entire region is failing under President Obama is simply that he is the first president to have abandoned the de-facto “Cain Doctrine” that has been the cornerstone of US policy throughout since the British mandate over Palestine expired in 1948.  Without this cornerstone alliance, only very recently abandoned, all US relationships, alliances, and US diplomacy with Israel and its neighbors have utterly disintegrated.

What we learn from the policy of President Obama is that absent the anchor of an evident, visible US-Israeli alliance, the US has no place to berth its power and influence in the region.

When President Obama abandoned Israel’s only peace treaty partner, Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, it was not interpreted by regional actors as siding with Egyptian democracy, but only as a further step taken by his administration to disengage the US from Israel.  From the palaces to the streets, the symbolism and effect was not lost in the Arab world.  And while it is convenient to say the US did not anticipate the sweep of Arab Spring passions for democracy, history will record a net loss of political freedom and US influence throughout the region.

When best friends don’t know where the US stands, it is impossible for our adversaries (and adversaries of our friends) to know.  Instead of the easily discernable framework of friends and enemies required by the game of peace, President Obama has thrown all the cards in the air, determined only that they will land in new hands.

For proof, witness the spectacle this week in the United Nations where the Palestinian Authority—a whole-cloth creation of the US at Oslo— thumbs its nose at the obligations it took to negotiate with Israel, simply demands admission to the UN, thus abandoning them.  One sees the domino effect of toppling decades of strong practical alliances and agreements throughout the region, not due to the audacity of antagonists, but due solely to the paucity of the US President.

Having established a pattern of visibly undermining the Israeli-US alliance, it was yet more ridiculous and dissembling for President Obama to stand at the UN podium and lecture the Palestinian Authority about what peace requires.  Oh really?

True perhaps the simplicity of the Cain Doctrine makes it easy fodder for liberals to question how far US obligations to Israel could extend.  But single-handedly and in less than 3 years, President Obama has shown us where the so-called alternative to it leads America in vivid, living diplomatic disaster.